When restoring film footage digitally, it can be advantageous to understand the film’s physical qualities before being digitised. Film gauge is a quality that defines the film’s physical width and provides hints to the image quality, such as grain size and resolution.

In this article, we explore the smallest film gauges and work our way up the common larger formats that you may come across. Throughout the article, I will be using 35mm Academy 4 perf frame for size comparison. In each case, I will be referring to the camera’s original neg / reversal areas, which is the ideal starting point for a digital restoration, rather than process or projection areas.

Standard / Regular 8mm / Double 8

Main usage: amateur/distribution

Standard 8mm frame size compared to a 35mm Academy 4perf frame

Measuring a tiny 8mm wide, this motion picture format was first released back in 1932 by Eastman Kodak. It is sometimes referred to as Standard 8mm, Regular 8mm or Double 8 and the main purpose of this format was to provide a cost-effective alternative to 16mm for amateur filmmaking and distribution during the Great Depression.

Interestingly, this film gauge is actually 16mm film with double the perforations down each side, allowing the user to expose half the frame, then flip the spool and expose the other half. In practice flipping, the spool needed a bit of experience so as not to expose the film. But it was certainly an interesting way to extend the run time from a single 16mm roll by exposing four 8mm frames in the space of one 16mm frame.

8mm frames exposed on 16mm on the left and standard 16mm film on the right

It’s unusual to see the film in its native state due to the fact that when the film was sent to the lab, it was processed, slit down the middle and spliced together to form a single reel of standard 8mm. There was another less common format called straight 8, which was pre-cut.

With a very small camera aperture of 4.5mm x 3.3mm the images produced by this format are very grainy and usually quite soft due to the vintage lens designs used for capture. Optically resolving fine detail in such a small area is a challenge even today. 

Thanks to the fact it uses a 16mm transport, the familiar gate weave that is synonymous with super 8 is far more controlled with standard 8. Due to this being an amateur format, cameras sometimes weren’t maintained to the same level as a professional camera and as such are prone to issues such as tramline scratches and gate hairs. Film burn is also fairly common due to the way the spool is loaded.

Super 8

Main usage: amateur/distribution

super 8 frame size compared to a 35mm Academy 4perf frame

Developed as an idea during the early 1960s and released in 1965, super 8 was designed to provide an easier-to-use, better-quality variant to the ageing standard 8mm format. Super 8 still uses the 8mm film gauge but uses more of the film’s surface area to expose at 5.46mm x 4.01mm vs 4.5mm x 3.3mm of the standard 8mm format which was achieved by drastically reducing the perforation size. Unlike 8mm, super 8 is cartridge fed making it much easier to load and more accessible to the end user. Super 8 also offered the ability to take a soundtrack between the edge of the frame and the edge of the exposure area.

As with 8mm, Super 8 has a very small exposure area when compared to something like 35mm and because of this also suffers a large visible grain structure. That said, when using comparable film stock, and scanned to the same resolution, it is a slightly finer grain when compared to standard 8mm. Super 8 cameras and optics were generally mass-produced and while some had outstanding mechanisms, a lot were very cheaply made, suffering from softness from poor optical design and incredible instability in the film transport.

Because of the point-and-shoot nature of super 8, people quite often did not check the film gate for debris. Scratches are also a common sight with this format.


Main usage: amateur/distribution

9.5mm frame size compared to a 35mm Academy 4perf frame

Introduced by Pathé in the early 1920s, 9.5mm was intended primarily as a distribution format for the projection of films in the home. Due to the fact, the format was easy to use and inexpensive, it rapidly became popular. Not long after its release, a camera system became available allowing amateur filmmakers to shoot with the format and was more common than you would think, especially in Europe. Mostly reversal film stocks were used with the camera.

The format used an unusual single perforation between each frame, which was a departure from other amateur and professional formats of the time which employed perforations on the side(s).

Although unusual, this design had a fairly significant benefit as it allowed for the area on the sides normally taken up by perforations to be used for picture area. Given that the format is only slightly larger than 8mm, it manages to cram in an image of 8.2mm by 6.15mm which, impressively, is just shy of the exposure area of standard 16mm.

The format slowly went into decline after the release of 8mm in the early 1930s despite the fact 8mm was considered to be an inferior format. By the 1960s the format was no more, only being kept alive by enthusiasts. Most examples of 9.5mm are in very good condition, which is perhaps a testament to the design, especially when compared to other film gauges of a similar vintage.

When scanned at a similar resolution to 8mm, 9.5mm has greater fidelity and a tighter grain structure. It does, however, suffer from the same common problems as those formats such as gate weave and blemishes like scratches and dirt covering a significant part of the image due to their relative size to the aperture.

Standard 16mm

Main usage: Industrial films, documentaries, news gathering, broadcast

Standard 16mm frame size compared to a 35mm Academy 4perf frame

Standard 16mm was introduced by Eastman Kodak in the early 1920s. Initially, the format was intended for amateur use as the film gauge was considered to be of inferior quality and not suitable for professional applications.

Having proven popular, during the 1930s the format was later developed with the addition of an optical soundtrack on the edge of the frame. The format went on to prove its worth extensively during World War Two and became the go-to format for many industries post-war thanks to it being a low-cost and high-quality alternative to traditional 35mm.

For television, the cost-benefit was particularly advantageous. In the period from 1960 to the 1990s, 16mm was used in television, especially by the BBC in the United Kingdom which worked extensively with Kodak to refine the format and found a great use for it, particularly for location shoots. Consequently, 16mm is a format you will likely come across in abundance in your archival restoration work.

Measuring 16mm across with two perforations on either side of each frame line when using double perf stock, the 10.26mm x 7.49mm camera aperture offered far superior quality to that of 8mm.

Having found its place in many professional environments, Standard 16mm was used with high-quality camera equipment and optics. This is why much of the footage shot on 16mm is sharp, well exposed and stable. When using a comparable film stock and scanned to a similar resolution, the grain structure is much tighter and more refined than that of 8mm formats. Additionally, there were higher quality colour negative stocks available for 16mm that weren’t available for 8mm. The format is also less prone to the artefacts you might see with poorly maintained amateur camera equipment.

Super 16

Main usage: modern broadcast, feature films, commercial

Super 16 frame size compared to a 35mm Academy 4perf frame

In 1969 Rune Ericson developed a new variant of the 16mm gauge designed to maximise the exposure area of the film. Standard 16mm has perforations on both sides of the film to allow registration pins in the camera to position the film correctly in the gate. While some 16mm cameras used registration pins for both sides of the film, quite a few 16mm cameras only used one and some used no registration pins at all. Ultimately, it was deemed that using a single registration pin had no detrimental effect on the resulting images and that the space used for the perforations on one side of the film was a waste. Removing the soundtrack area and perforations and then widening the camera film gate, it allowed the user to record a larger 1.66:1 ratio image onto the same 16mm film gauge and thus super 16mm was born.

Initially, this 1.66:1 aspect ratio meant it was more suited to feature films where it could be blown up to 35mm and presented in its native ratio or with minor amounts of cropping at 1.85:1. 16mm was still favoured for a while in traditional broadcasts because it matched the 1.33:1 viewing format and super 16mm offered no distinct advantage. However, with widescreen future proofing in mind and with the advent of HDTV broadcasts on the horizon, filmmakers ultimately began to shift to using Super 16mm to take advantage of the extra area the format provides.

Measuring 12.52mm x 7.41mm, Super 16mm offered approximately 21.5% more exposure area over standard 16mm. Of course, this added exposure area only became an advantage when presenting the format in 1.66:1 or 1.85:1 aspect ratios and where an equivalent piece of standard 16mm would have had to have been cropped severely to match it.

Super 16mm offers very similar image quality to standard 16mm. The grain structure is fairly coarse compared to 35mm but has an aesthetic which has become popular with modern filmmakers, who are after the characteristic film look while maintaining a level of control over the image. Super 16mm was and is still used with well-maintained professional cameras and optics. Artefacts and damage on the surface of the film will appear worse compared to 35mm scanned at a similar resolution due to the magnification. In general, gate weave is superior to the 8mm formats but stability is still not quite as good as 35mm.

The 35mm motion picture format

The 35mm film gauge is the most common and possibly the oldest type you will likely come across. The first form of this popular film gauge was introduced in 1892 by William Dickson and Thomas Edison and went on to become the accepted international standard for film projection in 1909 due to its size being a good trade-off between quality and cost.

The film gauge has chemically undergone many changes since then, including colour and a redesign to create a safer non-volatile film base. But, physically, it has remained the same with only the four perforations on either side having had very minor alterations for different applications.

Despite the rise of digital cinema cameras and only a single manufacturer making motion picture film stock, the 35mm film gauge is still in use today with many DOPs and cinematographers still preferring the look. Being the industry standard, countless feature films and television programmes have been shot on this film gauge and as such, it’s likely to be the most common format you work on as a digital restoration artist.

Edison’s silent 4 perf 35mm frame on the left and 4 perf Academy on the right

In its standard form, a 35mm film gauge has a maximum exposure area of 24.89mm by 18.67mm in a 1.33:1. However, the exact size of the exposure area varies depending on the given capture format. Below I describe the most common formats starting with the smallest 35mm variant.

35mm 2 perf / Techniscope

Main usage: feature films, modern broadcast, commercials

Techniscope frame on the left and 4 perf Academy on the right

Developed and introduced by Technicolour in 1963, this wide format uses an exposure area of 21.95mm by 9.47mm in a 2.33:1 ratio.

While looking physically small in comparison to the full aperture 35mm format, #Techniscope had some key advantages. Rather than using the standard four perforations in a negative pulldown, #Techniscope only used two perforations, which had the benefit of doubling the number of frames you could expose on a given roll of film. Additionally, standard spherical lenses could be used, which were more accessible and quite often faster, sharper and focused closer than the anamorphic equivalent. Despite four-perf with anamorphic lenses being the benchmark of the 35mm formats, two-perf allegedly had more clarity when projected, perhaps due to the simpler optics.

A number of major films used the format to great success including The Ipcress File (United Artists 1965) which had a major restoration using PFClean. Unfortunately, the format itself never quite reached the same popularity as four-perf as initially there was some criticism of the format due to additional complexities in editorial and printing, despite these generally being resolved with the advent of the digital intermediate. It was also generally considered to be more grainy when compared to four-perf due to the reduced size of the exposure area. Artefacts like gate hairs that would have been cropped out in other formats became a problem when restoring two-perf.

35mm three-perf

Main usage: modern broadcast, feature films, commercial

3 perf frame on the left and 4 perf Academy on the right

Initially devised and patented in 1975 by Miklos Lente and called Trilent 35, this format offered an exposure area of 21.95mm by 13.9mm in a near 1.78:1 ratio, using a three perforation pulldown. Initially, there was no industry interest in this obscure gauge and it lay dormant until the early 1980s when cinematographer Rune Ericson collaborated with Panavision to breathe new life into the format with the intention of initiating an industry change to convert all film equipment over to the format, including projection systems in theatres.

As with the two-perf Techniscope, there were advantages to using the now-renamed three-perf format. Due to the format using a three-perforation pulldown, the film ran through the camera 25% slower than four-perf, which resulted in a reasonable saving on film stock when shooting for non-anamorphic widescreen ratios.

Like Techniscope, 35mm three-perf simply never achieved the popularity of four-perf. Despite the savings in film stock, it came down to the fact that a huge amount of equipment such as projectors and optical printers would need to be converted, which proved to be undesirable. This didn’t stop people from using the format, though, as three-perf could be transferred optically to four-perf for release. Eventually, these issues became irrelevant as the digital intermediate process removed many of these obstacles. High-end television made good use of the format as it matched the ratio of HDTVs while saving money on film stock.

35mm four-perf Academy / 1.37:1 / 1.66:1 / 1.85:1

Main usage: modern broadcast, feature films, commercial

35mm Academy 4perf frames, showing the projection apertures 1.37:1, 1.66:1 and 1.85:1

Having gone through a few variations since its initial conception in the early 1920s, in 1932 the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences refined four-perf to bring standardisation to the industry. The format later became known simply as ‘Academy’.

With an aspect ratio of 1.37:1, the camera aperture measures 21.95 mm by 16mm with the soundtrack area on the left side. All films shot between 1932 and 1952 used the Academy 1.37:1.

In the early 1950s, Fox announced its upcoming widescreen format cinemascope. This led to the other studios looking for ways to achieve similar wider ratios for non-anamorphic (flat) presentations. In 1953, Paramount became the first to deviate from the standard 1.37:1 ratio with 1.66:1. This format was achieved by simply masking the top and bottom of the 1.37:1 image.

While America favoured 1.85:1, it was Europe which eventually adopted the format for presentations shooting large numbers of films in this format. These productions were often photographed conventionally using the full 1.37:1 and cropped later on rather than using any in-camera masking.

Universal Studios and Columbia Pictures were the first to utilise the 1.85:1 format and the ratio was achieved similarly to the way 1.66:1 was derived, by cropping the academy 1.37:1 frame at the top and bottom. This provided a way for the industry to provide a true widescreen ratio while keeping the costs down when modifying existing equipment. It also provided an easy way for films shot for 1.66:1 to be presented in 1.85:1 as the framing differences weren’t drastic. By the mid-1950s, 1.85:1 became the standard for non-anamorphic theatrical presentation in America.

Right up until today the vast majority of non-anamorphic features are still exhibited in the 1.85:1 ratio, with countless features being shot in this format. Recently, there has been a small resurgence in the format for acquisition, a great example being Wes Anderson’s 2014 award-winning The Grand Budapest Hotel.

Super 35mm

Main usage: feature films, modern broadcast, commercial

Super35 3 perf on the left, 4 perf Academy in the centre and Super35 4perf on the right

The initial concept for Super35 was to return to using the entire width of the aperture area of the four-perf 35mm film, which, in essence, is the same as Edison’s silent original from the early 1900s.

The concept was to expose the full area of the frame and then crop down to 2.35:1 and reduction print/blowdown to a four-perf print, with the theory being that the use of a larger area of the film when compared to the academy formats would provide increased fidelity and tighter grain. Confusingly, there is also a three-perf version of Super35.

Super35 uses the full aperture area of 24.89mm by 18.67mm in four-perf and 24,9mm by 14,7 mm in three-perf. These were provisions in framing to allow for a television version to be made with the maximum amount of neg area. 

In the pre-digital intermediate era, the format was controversial among industry professionals. Many believed the steps required to print the extracted Super35 area to a four-perf print optically softened the image and negated its benefits. However, some preferred the process and the ease of working with spherical lenses. James Cameron is a big proponent, having shot a number of his films on the format.

When digital intermediate (DI) came about in the early 2000s, many issues using Super35 disappeared. With DI, Super35 could be scanned into the computer, cropped to 2.39:1 and rendered to an anamorphic four-perf frame size without any generation loss. Additionally, there were benefits to working in post-production with the entire uncropped area of Super35. Images could be easily re-racked, and the extra information outside of the crop area benefited visual effects and proved a popular modern format, with many films being shot on the format.

Anamorphic 35mm ‘Scope’

Main usage: feature films, commercials.

Original CinemaScope on the left, modern (Scope) frame in the middle and 4 perf Academy on the right

While it has its origins in the early 1920s and optically even before WW1, the primary use of anamorphic in the film industry began with the race to create wider aspect ratios for cinema presentation during the early 1950s to compete against the increasing popularity of television. While other studios went down the road of matting the top and bottom of the 1.37:1 academy area to achieve a widescreen ratio, it was 20th Century Fox that chose the anamorphic format naming it CinemaScope and produced many films between 1953 and 1967 using the total aperture area of the four-perf 35mm frame. With SMPTE and Panavision making changes and refinements to the format during that time, including slight differences in aspect ratio and the inclusion of an optical soundtrack area, it later became known as ‘Scope’.

Rather than projecting a spherical image onto the film plane, anamorphic optics project a horizontally compressed oval image in a 2x ratio or 2:1. When the film is processed, a print is made for projection and another anamorphic lens with a matching 2:1 squeeze factor is used on the front of the projector to un-squeeze the image and present it in its correct ratio. For capture, anamorphic uses nearly the full height of the 35mm four-perf frame with an exposure area of 21.95mm by 18.6mm. The format was an ingenious way to maximise the negative space while delivering a very wide aspect ratio of 2.39:1 and still using the same film stock, cameras and projection.

Anamorphic is an exciting format, which has seen a resurgence in recent years, with many directors such as J.J. Abrams and Christopher Nolan opting to use the format, keen to capture the classic cinematic look for a modern presentation. Because the format uses much more of the 35mm neg’s surface area, approximately 408 mm², the grain structure is much tighter when compared to other 35mm formats with the same presentation ratio. Due to complex optics, flaring is common, and often, there is fall-off and softness towards the edges of the frame, especially in older films. While these aren’t usually problems you would want to remove during the digital restoration process, they can make the process much more difficult.


Main usage: feature films, visual effects

8 perf VistaVision frame on the left and 4 perf Academy on the right

VistaVision was first created by Paramount Pictures back in 1954. Often referred to as lazy eight because the film travels horizontally through the gate, it is very similar to the 135 still photography format, which uses eight perforations top and bottom per exposed frame. The primary purpose of the design was to create a finer-grained print for widescreen 1.66:1 presentations. With an exposure area measuring a massive 37.39mm by 25.3mm, it was a significant step up in quality vs. the traditional four-perf Academy format.

Despite a large number of feature films being shot in the format, Paramount discontinued it less than a decade after they introduced it, mainly due to the fact there had been significant advances in film stocks which negated the benefits of the format. Vistavision was still used in other countries, such as Japan, up until the late 1980s. That wasn’t the end for VistaVision, though.

Cheaper than 65mm, combined with current finer grain film stocks and increased stability of the eight-perf mechanism, VistaVision became the go-to format for many visual effects productions. The format’s advantages became apparent when optical printing and VFX companies like Industrial Light and Magic revived the format, using it extensively in their motion control systems to photograph effects models for the Star Wars films. Today, Vistavision is still in use for visual effects heavy projects shot on film where fine grain and increased resolution are beneficial.  Christopher Nolan used it for his feature film Interstellar.

Ideas from VistaVision eventually evolved into the IMAX 70mm format, which uses a similar horizontal film feed. The design lives on in digital form with modern high-resolution digital cinema cameras using a VistaVision-sized sensor.

65mm, 5 perf

Main usage: feature films, visual effects

65mm frame on the left and 4 perf Academy on the right

The 65/70mm film gauge has been around since the early days of the film industry, but producer Mike Todd in the early 1950s should be credited with popularising the format again. The Todd-AO process was developed as a competing system to Cinerama, a hugely complex and expensive system at the time.

This film format used two separate film elements – 65mm to capture the images during production and 70mm print for distribution in the theatres. With perforations lining up on both gauge sizes, the extra 5mm on the 70mm is used for optical soundtracks.

Panavision adopted the format after Mike Todd’s death in 1958, creating slight variations in Super Panavision and Ultra Panavision 70. These variations are mechanically compatible with the original format, with Ultra 70 being a 1.25x anamorphic system, creating a vast aspect ratio. Quentin Tarantino used Ultra Panavision 70 for his 2015 film The Hateful Eight.

The 65mm camera neg uses a huge camera aperture of 52.48mm by 23.01mm surpassing the quality of even the most significant 35mm format. 65mm using 1207mm² of exposure area vs 35mm anamorphic 408mm². The quality on screen was unmatched and was only surpassed by the specialist 15 perf 70mm IMAX format in recent years. However, the cost of shooting in 65mm was extraordinarily high and reserved for use on only the highest-budget films.

Plenty of 70mm prints were made, especially from 35mm anamorphic blowups, which took advantage of the higher quality presentation format and the better sound. While a print is not the ideal starting point for restoration, 70mm does offer vastly superior quality compared to a conventional 35mm print. Additionally, the format was used for optical effects work to increase fidelity and reduce the amount of grain in the final images when optically printing.

Iconic films like 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) have been shot entirely on 65mm, 1992’s Baraka being a stunning example of what the format is capable of. Christopher Nolan shot large segments of Dunkirk (2017) using 65mm, with key sequences being shot with the larger IMAX format. When scanned at a comparable resolution to 35mm, the grain structure is extremely tight and the fidelity is exceptionally high. A larger area of film can have the potential for more surface dirt and issues. Still, generally, being such a high-end format, the camera’s original 65mm film elements are exceptionally well looked after.